A group of four children in a classroom focused on learning activities using tablets. Two students are sharing a tablet on the right, while another student uses a tablet individually on the left.

The why behind the firefly

Discover the evidence-based learning that drives Lumio's product development.

Lumio Logic Model

This model outlines the ways students and educators use Lumio, the features that make it special and the expected outcomes from integrating it into learning activities. Lumio is developed and updated based on this logic model, ensuring that product improvements lead to desired learning outcomes.

Explore the why for
  • Button icon for 'Students' with a silhouette of a person, indicating a section for student resources. Students
  • Button icon for 'Educators' dedicated to teacher resources or access. Educators

What do students do with Lumio?

They actively engage in learning.

Hands-on activities

Engage in hands-on learning with interactive content

Flexible learning pacing

Connect to lessons synchronously or asynchronously to work at your own pace and take ownership of learning

Collaborative activities

Collaborate with peers through interactive workspaces to actively learn together

What makes Lumio special to students?

It increases student engagement and collaboration.

Easy real-world application

Individual, small group or whole-class interactive activities

Game-based learning opportunities

Create visual connections between concepts and concrete models

What do educators do with Lumio?

They amplify best teaching practises.

Transform content

Transform static content to create and deliver interactive lessons

Personalise learning and pacing

Toggle between student-paced and teacher-paced modes to personalise learning

Formative assessment tools

Check for student understanding with interactive formative assessment tools

Insights in real-time

Adjust lessons based on real-time feedback

What makes Lumio special to educators?

It makes learning more accessible.

Flexibility to participate anonymously

Support scaffolded learning with instructional audio

Build confidence and support fluency with Immersive Reader

Opportunity to differentiate with asynchronous learning

It provides insight into learning.

Gauge student progress

Provide real-time feedback

Adjust lessons on the go

What does the data tell us?

Educators using Lumio agree that it promotes active learning, increases students' engagement in classrooms and makes their lessons interactive.

Supports best teaching practises

87% use Lumio to create lessons connected to real-life
87% use Lumio to provide feedback to students in real-time
93% adjust Lumio lessons on-the-go based on student progress
96% provide more practise opportunities using Lumio

Increases accessibility

87% use Lumio to gather student voice and provide autonomy
80% use asynchronous learning opportunities through Lumio
84% regularly use the student pacing feature for lesson delivery
Data is based on an internally conducted survey (Lumio Efficacy Survey). Respondents comprised of educators distributed evenly across K-12 grades and all subject areas.

Quick wins with Lumio

Student application

Improve student problem-solving, multimodal communication and collaboration skills.

Comprehension and processing

Students construct knowledge to demonstrate understanding and master learning objectives through creative thinking and application.

Change in attitude

Empower students to take ownership of their own learning by improving practise and engaging in the process.

Long-term outcomes

Improve student mastery

Meet the needs of all learners to close achievement gaps and improve student mastery.

Boost student satisfaction

Help students find meaning and self-expression in their learning experience.

Increased engagement rates

Engaged learners have an increased desire to participate in class, improving attendance and graduation rates.

We earned the prestigious Research-Based Design Certification from Digital Promise – proof it works.

Lumio is not just innovative — it is grounded in research

Ignite student engagement

Research shows that promoting student agency positively impacts student engagement and higher-order thinking.

See how Lumio yellow circle forward arrow icon.

Check for student understanding

Regular checks for student understanding with actionable feedback loops have positive outcomes on student learning and development.

See how Lumio yellow circle forward arrow icon.

Increase student accessibility to learning

A Universal Design for Learning (UDL) approach facilitates inclusive and accessible classroom cultures, fostering collaborative problem-solving.

See how Lumio yellow circle forward arrow icon.
Bring Lumio’s trusted learning platform to your school.
Illustration showing a PDF download icon for sharing Lumio benefits with school or district administrators.

Want to get your school or district on board?

Download this FREE PDF to share Lumio with your school administrator, so they can see exactly how Lumio can enhance learning.

Download now
Citations
  • Astin, A.W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
  • Black, P., Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
  • Essam, R. and Passey, D. (2022) Identifying ‘best practices’ in education: Findings from a literature review. Lancaster University, Lancaster.
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  • Glanville, J. L. and Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406299126
  • Hollenbeck, K., Rozek-Tedesco, M. A., Tindal, G. and Glasgow, A. (2000). An Exploratory Study of Student-Paced versus Teacher-Paced Accommodations for Large-Scale Maths Tests. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500203
  • Jaggars, S. S., Edgecombe, N. and Stacey, G. W. (2013, April). Creating an effective online instructor presence. Report completed for the Community College Research Centre, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY
  • Mandernach, B. J., Donnelli-Sallee, E. and Dailey-Hebert, A. (2011). Assessing course student engagement. In R. Miller, E. Amsel, B. M. Kowalewski, B.B. Beins, K. D. Keith and B. F. Peden (Eds.), Promoting student engagement: Techniques and opportunities (pp. 277- 281). Society for the Teaching of Psychology, Division 2, American Psychological Association
  • Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research, Vol. 2. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Tullis, J.G. and Benjamin, A.S. (2011). On the effectiveness of self-paced learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(2) 109–118., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.002